Quality · CAPA

CAPA

Corrective and preventive action is where a quality system either learns or repeats itself. This hub connects the reference material, the maturity model, the assessment and the practical guidance.

In one line

CAPA is judged on whether the problem stopped, not on whether the record closed.

One GMP problem. Multiple perspectives.Roles that genuinely see this differently — not the same text with the job title changed.

CAPA from five GMP roles

QA

Quality assurance and the system as a whole

Did the action remove the cause, and can we show it?

Effectiveness criteria defined before implementation, checked against real data afterwards. Where retraining recurs against similar events, the record documents a pattern rather than a set of incidents.

QC

Laboratory, testing and analytical data

Are laboratory events feeding the same system?

OOS and OOT outcomes should enter the CAPA system on the same terms as production events, and laboratory root causes need the same evidential standard.

Manufacturing

Production, process and the floor

Is the process still generating the failure?

Where the design invites the error, a training action is a delay rather than a correction. Investigation also consumes production and engineering time, so recurrence is capacity spent twice.

QP

Certification and batch release

What does an open action mean for certification?

Where a batch is affected by an unresolved deviation, Annex 16 sets expectations and the rationale for certifying must be documented.

Regulatory

Requirements, dossier and authority expectations

How will this read to an inspectorate?

Overdue actions are visible in your own records, and a repeat finding is treated far more seriously than a first because it shows the previous correction did not work.

Next step

Score it rather than estimate it

The GMP Health Index scores seven quality-system domains and maps each to a maturity level. It calculates in your browser and keeps history on your device only.